Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.


 

Coronavirus Special  –  Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary Continue reading

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary Continue reading

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary Continue reading

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary Continue reading

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins Continue reading

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 • Continue reading

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary Continue reading

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary Continue reading

Destination: Titan –  Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ Continue reading

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary Continue reading

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

  [smartslider3 slider=”2″]

Posted in Documentaries | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.


 

Coronavirus Special  –  Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary Continue reading

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary Continue reading

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary Continue reading

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary Continue reading

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins Continue reading

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 • Continue reading

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary Continue reading

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary Continue reading

Destination: Titan –  Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ Continue reading

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary Continue reading

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

  [smartslider3 slider=”2″]


Posted in Documentaries | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Scientists Rule Out Aliens As the Explanation for ‘Oumuamua

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.


Researchers have been stumped for two years as to what ‘Oumuamua, the structure that was seen passing through the solar system really is.

Astronomers and physicists think it could be an asteroid, but it’s too agile and doesn’t move like a rigid rock. It doesn’t fall under the comet category because its too dry a structure.

 

Could sunbeams move ‘oumuamua?

 

Some think its made of a porous material that makes it light enough to be moved by sunbeams but sturdy enough not to break apart as it travels through the solar system. Research out of the University of Oslo supports that theory.

The work, led by Eirik Flekkøy, a physicist at the University of Oslo was inspired by Amay Moro-Martin’s theory that the sun was indeed pushing ‘Oumuamua because it was lightweight enough, according to Popular Science. Moro-Martin is a Spec Telecor Science Institute Astronomer.

 

Flekkøy and his team wanted to see if that theory was true and after studying ‘Omuamua’s rotation they noticed the slowing of the rotation fit with the theory that light can provide more force on certain surfaces. When the surfaces cool down it two can force movement. So if the sun can cause ‘Oumuamua to turn it could also make it go faster, validating the theory. 

 

Light but sturdy enough not to break apart 

To test the theory further, after all, it has to be porous enough to push the sunbeams through, the researcher calculated how a dust ball would hold up if it was spinning with the sun gravitational pull hard on one side. The structure is strong enough to not break apart on its journey.

 “The first known interstellar object ‘Oumuamua exhibited a nongravitational acceleration that appeared inconsistent with cometary outgassing, leaving radiation pressure as the most likely force,” wrote the researchers in a paper published in the journal 

Astrophysical.  “Barring the alien lightsail hypothesis, an ultra-low density due to a fractal structure might also explain the acceleration of ‘Oumuamua by radiation pressure.”

 

In the fall the second interstellar comet sighting was made, with astronomers saying they detected another space rock that formed in a distant system before passing through our solar system. Scientists are able to tell its coming from outside our solar system because of speed and trajectory. 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

BelugaXL receives EASA Type Certification

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.

Airbus’ BelugaXL cargo transport aircraft has received type certification from the European Aviation Safety Agency ahead of its planned entry-into-service early next year.

The aircraft is 63m (206ft) long, around 7m (23ft) longer than the Beluga ST it is replacing and can carry 30% more cargo. Based on the A330, the Beluga XL has been modified to feature highly-enlarged cargo bay structure and modified rear and tail section.

Airbus uses the Beluga aircraft to move large sections of aircraft between 11 of its manufacturing and assembly sites in Europe.

The aircraft is an integral part of Airbus’ industrial system and a key enabler for production ramp-up requirements beyond 2019. The BelugaXL allows for 30% extra transport capacity being 7 metres longer and 1 metre wider than its BelugaST predecessor.

The company plans to have built six Beluga XLs by 2023 to replace its current fleet of Beluga STs.

Flight testing of the Beluga XL began on July 19, 2018 from Airbus’ Toulouse headquarters in France and incorporated 200 flight tests and 700 flight hours.

According to Airbus, the Beluga XL has the largest cargo bay cross-section of all existing cargo aircraft worldwide, enabling it to carry two A350 XWB wings compared to the BelugaST, which can carry one. The aircraft, which is powered by Rolls Royce Trent 700 engines can carry up to 51 tonnes and has a range of 4,000km (2200nm).

Posted in News | Leave a comment

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.


 

Coronavirus Special  –  Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary Continue reading

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary Continue reading

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary Continue reading

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary Continue reading

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins Continue reading

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 • Continue reading

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary Continue reading

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary Continue reading

Destination: Titan –  Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ Continue reading

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary Continue reading

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

  [smartslider3 slider=”2″]


Posted in Documentaries | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.


 

Coronavirus Special  –  Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020

Coronavirus Special – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2019

Hack the Moon: Heroes of Apollo – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020

The Sacrifice of Cassini – Documentary 2020 Continue reading

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary

Boeing 737 8-Max CRASH investigation – Documentary Continue reading

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary

China’s Space Program – Documentary Continue reading

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary

The Mystery of Oumuamua – Documentary Continue reading

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary

The Rocket • Breakthrough the Ideas that Changed the World – Documentary Continue reading

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins

Gravitational Waves: A New Era of Astronomy Begins Continue reading

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 •

Touching the Sun – Documentary • 2019 • Continue reading

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Breakthrough: Opportunity a Life on Mars – Documentary • 2019 •

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary

Finding the Next Earth – Full Documentary Continue reading

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary

NEPTUNE & URANUS – A Traveler’s Guide to the Planets | Full Documentary Continue reading

Destination: Titan –  Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ

Destination: Titan – Documentary ᴴᴰ Continue reading

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary

Strangest Planets In Space – Documentary Continue reading

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Exploring The Dark Web – Documentary 2019

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

The Biggest Scientific Discoveries of 2019 – Documentary

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, … Continue reading

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

A JOURNEY TO THE ISS – NEW SPACE DOCUMENTARY

  [smartslider3 slider=”2″]

Posted in Documentaries | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Two tragic flights, 12 problems on the Boeing 737 MAX

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.


The flights were eerily similar, just minutes long, with pilots engaged in a terrifying battle against an automated safety system that ultimately sent the 737 MAX jets plunging to earth.

But the journeys of Lion Air 610 and Ethiopian Airlines 302 also contained some stark differences. The pilots in the second crash had the lessons of the first, with new guidelines from Boeing and the FAA. They tried to follow instructions for recovering the jet. It still wasn’t enough.

Here, we examine the arc of the two tragic flights, tracking the movements of pilots and the details of flight-deck data through critical seconds.

 

Lion Air Flight 610

Oct. 29, 2018

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

March 10, 2019

 

Before takeoff

Problem 1 – Lion Air Flight 610

The two angle-of-attack (AOA) sensors on the nose of the jet recorded starkly different values

Even before takeoff with 189 people on board, the data on Lion Air 610 showed evidence of a problem. As the plane taxied, the two angle-of-attack (AOA) sensors on the nose of the jet recorded starkly different values. The left sensor was clearly wrong — the plane was still on the ground — but the aircraft didn’t recognize the discrepancy. 

 

The angle of attack is the angle between the wing and the airflow. The sensors include vanes that align themselves with oncoming airflow. The angle of the vane changes as the plane’s nose rises or falls.

 

Problem 2 – Lion Air Flight 610 Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

Those sensors are critical. While some airplanes, particularly those from Boeing rival Airbus, have three such sensors that can work with one another in the case of an erroneous value, Boeing’s 737 MAX has just two, and the aircraft used only one of those sensors to trigger a new automated system — MCAS — that would force the nose of the plane down if the sensor indicated a potential stall. Records also show that previous flights of this aircraft had problems with the angle-of-attack sensor.

 

 

The first minutes Lion Air Flight 610

Immediately after takeoff, the Lion Air plane began giving the pilots warnings as a result of the faulty sensor. The captain’s control stick began shaking, an indicator of a potential stall. The crew asked ground controllers to confirm their altitude and airspeed, due to disagreements on their instruments caused by the same faulty angle-of-attack sensor. They reported problems with the flight controls.

 

 

After climbing above 2,000 feet, the pilots retracted the flaps on the wings. The MCAS system, which the crew was unaware of, is designed to turn on once the flight crew retracts the flaps and disengages the autopilot. Seconds later, just a couple of minutes into the flight, the MCAS safety system engaged, pushing the nose down. The plane descended. The pilots were able to regain control of their ascent by extending the wing flaps again, preventing MCAS from engaging. But it wouldn’t be long before the crew was ready to retract the flaps again.

 

The first minutes – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

On Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, with 157 on board, there was no sign of a problem before takeoff. Flight data shows the angle-of-attack sensors tracking each other identically. That stayed consistent while the plane was on the ground, but it was about to change, just not in the same way that it did on Lion Air 610.

 

 

Shortly after takeoff, Ethiopian 302’s angle-of-attack sensors recorded a sudden disagreement. It’s unclear what caused the fault, though the suddenness and severity of the change suggests a bird strike may have cut off one of the AOA vanes, which protrude from the front of the plane.

 

 

Problem 3 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

The plane’s left sensor, the one that apparently controlled the MCAS system, recorded an angle of attack at 74.5 degrees — far higher than would be conceivable. A stall would typically be a risk before 20 degrees.

The sensor’s value remained stuck. But even though the sensor was no longer showing even slight fluctuations and was stuck at an inconceivable value, MCAS continued considering it valid data.

 

 

 

Problem 4 Lion Air Flight 610 Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

This set off a cascade of warning indicators in both cockpits — airspeed, altitude and stall — for the pilots to consider. The MAX was supposed to come with an indicator to tell the pilots that there was a disagreement between the two angle-of-attack sensors. However, due to a software glitch that Boeing discovered back in 2017 but hadn’t fixed, that light wasn’t actually functional for most customers, including both Lion Air and Ethiopian Airlines.

 

 

MCAS kicks in

Problem 5 Lion Air Flight 610

After ascending to 5,000 feet, the Lion Air pilots retracted their flaps again. The MCAS system soon reactivated, turning the plane’s nose down. Flight data shows the pilots manually countering the MCAS system, using electrical thumb switches on the control column to bring the nose of the plane back up.

But instead of shutting off and ceding control to the pilots, MCAS repeatedly engaged. Over the next seven minutes, MCAS pushed the plane down more than two dozen times. By using the electric trim power, accessible by thumb switches on the yoke, and by pulling back on the control column, the pilots were able to move the nose back up.

 

 

Problem 6 Lion Air Flight 610 Ethiopian Airlines Flight 30

While MCAS moved the jet nose down with substantial power, Boeing had determined that pilot training was not necessary for the system and MCAS was not included in the pilot manual.

Boeing believed pilots would consider repeated nose-down commands to be similar to a runaway stabilizer, for which there is a cockpit checklist. But the pilots appear to have not interpreted their readings that way and fixated on other issues: They asked ground controllers to help determine their altitude because those readings were haywire due to the faulty sensor.

 

 

Problem 7 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

Five seconds after the Ethiopian pilots disengaged the autopilot, MCAS took control. The system moved the trim down 2.5 units, sending the plane into descent. As first reported in The Seattle Times, FAA officials believed, based on Boeing’s initial system safety assessment of the MAX aircraft, that MCAS was only supposed to be able to move the trim by 0.6 units, not 2.5.

 

 

Problem 8 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

In addition, because MCAS repeatedly engaged, it effectively acted with unlimited power. The pitch of the jet is marked on a scale that’s visible on the stabilizer trim wheel beside the throttles. On this scale, 0 is maximum nose-down pitch and 4.7 is level flight. The green band on the wheel shows the range of where the pitch should be in normal flight. At one point in the Ethiopian 302 flight, MCAS pushed the stabilizer to just 0.4 units, a severe nose-down pitch.

Then, just 35 seconds after the sudden takeover of MCAS, the pilots appeared to have relied on Boeing guidance on how to shut it off. The first officer called out “stab trim cutout” two times. The captain agreed, so the crew flipped the two “Stab Trim” cutout switches (seen at bottom right) to block electric movements of the horizontal tail.

 

 

The fight to save the plane Lion Air Flight 610

After more than five minutes of battling the plane, the repeated efforts by the Lion Air pilots broke down. They had been talking with ground controllers about their direction and plans, then the second-in-command asked for a new direction to apparently avoid some weather. Just 11 seconds later, the pilot asked for help determining the altitude again.

Data from the report shows that the captain successfully countered MCAS more than 20 times. However, the data suggests the first officer then took over, perhaps to let the captain figure out what was happening. The plane then responded to two further nose-down commands with only short flicks of the thumb switches, which failed to fully counter the movement. That sent the plane’s trim further down.

 

 

Problem 9 Lion Air Flight 610 

Separate data released to the Indonesian parliament shows the pilots desperately pulling the control column back. On the previous 737 model and other Boeing planes, a pilot pulling back hard on the column would trigger a cutout switch that would halt automatic commands in the opposite direction. In order to make MCAS work, Boeing had to disable that feature when the new flight control system was active.

 

 

Horizontal Tail issue – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

While the Ethiopian Airlines pilots had cut off the electric power that moved the horizontal tail, the tail was still in a position to pitch the nose down. The pilots pulled on the control column and continued ascending thanks to the elevator tabs on the trailing edge of the horizontal tail.

The raised elevator tabs at the back and the leading edge of the horizontal tail swiveled upward form a sort of V shape that creates opposing nose-up and nose-down forces.

 

Boeing’s previous 737 model had two separate cutout switches, one specifically for electric power to the automatic controls, the other for electrical power to the manual thumb switch on the control column. However, the option to operate these separately was never included in the manuals. And on the MAX, the two switches had identical functions. One primary and one backup, either one cut out all electric power, automatic and manual. Standard procedure was to flip both at once.

Problem 10 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

Having hit the cutout switches, the only way the Ethiopian crew could adjust the horizontal tail was to do it manually, by physically turning a wheel beside the pilot that is connected by cables to the back of the plane. The first officer tried but reported that it wasn’t working.

Boeing has described the shutoff of the trim as simple, but with the swiveled horizontal tail pushing nose down and the pilot-controlled elevator tabs on the back pushing nose up, the airflow can create substantial force that makes it physically challenging for pilots to move the wheel and swivel the trim manually.

 

Problem 11 – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

Boeing’s emergency directive, issued after the Lion Air crash, included a line near the bottom that mentions a way to avoid high forces making the manual trim wheel hard to move. It says that pilots “can” use the electric trim switches on the control column to neutralize those forces before hitting the cutout switches

But that was not emphasized as a necessary step to avoid disaster. It appears that the Ethiopian pilots, eager to stop MCAS quickly and avoid the fate of the Lion Air flight, jumped immediately to the cutout switches without the vital step of first using the thumb switches to ease the forces on the horizontal tail. That’s why they couldn’t move it manually.

 

 

The final seconds Lion Air Flight 610

Just 31 seconds before the Lion Air crash, the pilot was still well aware of his surroundings, asking ground controllers to prevent other planes from flying near their altitude. When the controller asked their preferred altitude, the pilot responded: “five thou.” That was 19 seconds before the crash.

 

Problem 12 – Lion Air Flight 610
The pilot pulled on the control column with all possible force. But with the column only controlling the elevator tabs at the back of the horizontal tail, he was unable to fully counter the nose-down pitch from the MCAS swiveling of the larger portion of the horizontal tail.

 

 

The airspeed rose.

The swiftness of the descent increased.

The pilots lost control.

Even in the doomed plummet, they yanked the control column in desperation. At 6:31:54 a.m., Lion Air Flight 610 nose-dived into the Java Sea at about 500 mph.

 

 

The final seconds – Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302

The Ethiopian Airline pilots inexplicably hadn’t throttled back the engines, which were still at takeoff power. As a result, the speed of the plane rose well above 400 mph — higher than the maximum design speed of the airplane. That triggered overspeed warnings in the cockpit that include an alarming clicking sound called a “clacker.” At that speed, the forces on the tail would have made it impossible to move manually.

The pilots were likely using sizable physical effort to keep the plane level by pulling back on the control column. They then made a call: Their efforts to keep the airplane pitch were not enough. They decided to re-engage the electric controls. With the electric power to the tail restored, they used the thumb buttons to trim the nose up — but, for some reason, not substantially, just two short flicks. One expert theorized that the plane’s high speed may have caused an alarming shudder when they moved the trim.

 

For a few seconds, they eased the descent. But with the electric power restored, MCAS now re-engaged.

The plane abruptly turned downward again with a force that would have pitched passengers off their seats. The plane dove steeper, faster.

Just 23 seconds after MCAS had re-engaged, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 — traveling at a speed approaching 600 mph — smashed into the ground at 8:43:43 a.m. The compact, deep crater in the earth indicated a near-vertical impact.

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Reusable Spaceplanes – Overview

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.

The idea of reusable spaceplanes has been around since the beginning of the Space Age. But it’s only in recent years that we’ve really seen them take off. When it comes right down to it, space exploration is pretty darn expensive! The cost of building and servicing launch vehicles is bad enough, but once you factor in the cost of fuel, it gets downright prohibitive. It is little wonder why until recently, only federal space agencies were able to do it. To reduce the associated costs and make space exploration more accessible, space agencies all over the world are looking to reusable spacecraft. Much like reusable rockets, which are being pursued by aerospace companies like SpaceX and Blue Origin, spaceplanes are expected to cut the costs of going into space exponentially. Granted, this is not an entirely new concept. Since the dawn of the Space Age, designs for reusable spaceplanes have been on the books. But it’s only been since the closing of the Apollo Era that these and other concepts have been pursued – mainly out of necessity.

And with the age of renewed space exploration upon us, many of the old ideas are being picked up, dusted off, and reevaluated for modern use. Let’s take a look at the history of the idea and where it might lead us.

 

 

Early concepts

As with everything else that has to do with space exploration, the history of reusable spacecraft began shortly after World War II. At the time, the United States and the Soviet Union were locked in a state of competition and one-upmanship that would last for almost five decades.

Both had taken possession of Germany, and both were in possession of a great deal of technology and expertise as a result. This included advancements in jet propulsion and rocketry, which both sides attempted to leverage to gain an advantage over the other.

In addition to setting new speed records for aircraft, the US and Soviets both wanted to send artificial satellites and crewed spacecraft to orbit. The ultimate goal was not only to prove the superiority of their respective economies but to avoid being left at a disadvantage militarily.

 

Going supersonic:

Immediately after WWII, Soviet and American scientists began pursuing experiments using rocket-powered aircraft. In many respects, this was a continuation of experiments conducted by Germany during the war.

Faced with overwhelming odds in the air, German scientists were tasked with investigating other methods of propulsion to create fighter and bomber aircraft that were superior to anything the Allies could muster. In addition to jet engines, rockets were also tested extensively.

 

The Bell X-1 during a test flight. Source: NASA

For the latter, the military applications appeared limited. Rocket aircraft were difficult to maneuver once airborne, and takeoff and landing were very difficult for pilots to perform. But when it came to speed, they were unmatched.

 

For this reason, American and Soviet aerospace engineers successfully experimented with a number of reusable aircraft that were capable of achieving altitudes and speeds that were unheard of before. These helped pave the way towards orbital spacecraft and launches.

Examples include the Bell X-1, an experimental aircraft developed jointly by the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA, the predecessor to NASA), the U.S. Army Air Forces, and the U.S. Air Force (USAF).

On Oct. 14th, 1947, this aircraft flew its fiftieth sortie and was piloted by legendary test pilot Capt. Charles “Chuck” Yeager. On this sortie, the X-1 became the first aircraft to achieve a velocity of 1,100 km/h (700 mph).

In other words, Yeager and the X-1 became the first pilot and aircraft to break the sound barrier (Mach 1). In the years following, the sound barrier would be broken many times more by the X-1 and other variants on the design.

 

The Cold War peaks

By the late 1950s and throughout the 1960s, the development of experimental aircraft and spacecraft reached a pinnacle. This reflected the progress that was being made with the respective US and Soviet space programs, both of whom were pursuing rockets and spacecraft that could reach the Moon.

It was within this historical context that the North American X-15 design began conducting test flights, eventually culminating in the aircraft reaching speeds of up to Mach 6.7 (8270 km/h; 5,140 mph) and altitudes of over 100 km (66 mi).

The X-15 in flight. Source: Andrews AFB

 

Between 1957 and 1963, the USAF and Boeing also looked into the creation of a military spaceplane that would be able to be conduct everything from reconnaissance and rescue operations to satellite maintenance and sabotage.

The result was the X-20 Dynamic Soarer (Dyna-Soar), a single-pilot spacecraft that would be launched into space by a single-stage rocket and then land on an airstrip under its own power. While the program would be abandoned just as construction began, the design would inform future concepts like the Dream Chaser (see below).

In 1965, the Soviets also began work on a reusable spaceplane through the Experimental Passenger Orbital Aircraft (EPOS) program, also known as “Spiral”. This eventually led to the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-105, a crewed horizontal take-off and landing (HOTOL) spaceplane.

The project was halted in 1969 but resumed in 1974 in response to the U.S. Space Shuttle program. The first test flight was conducted in 1976 and a total of eight flights were made until 1978 when EPOS was canceled in favor of the Buran program (see below).

 

 

The space shuttle era

By the early 1970s, a changing budget environment and the end of the “Space Race” forced both NASA and the Soviet Union to investigate ways to reduce the associated cost of space launches. It was from this point to the second decade of the 21st century that earlier designs for reusable spaceplanes were finally developed.

For the United States, this resulted in the Space Shuttle Program, which ran from 1983 and ended with the retirement of the remaining Space Shuttles in 2011. Officially, the program was known as the Space

Transportation System (STS) and was based on plans for reusable spacecraft drafted in 1969.


The system consisting of a reusable orbiter vehicle that would be launched into space using two solid-fuel rockets and an external fuel tank. The Space Shuttle fleet consisted of six orbiter vehicles, named the Space Shuttle Atlantis, Columbia, Challenger, Discovery, Endeavour, and Enterprise.

The Space Shuttle fleet began making operational flights in 1982 (with the Space Shuttle Columbia) and conducted a total of 135 flights, the last being made by the Space Shuttle Atlantis is 2011.

Among other things, these missions involved the Space Shuttle deploying satellites, the Hubble Space

Telescope, and aiding in the construction of the Soviet/Russia space station Mir. Two shuttles were lost during their 15 years of service – the Challenger in 1986 and the Columbia in 2003.

During this same period, the Soviets developed their own reusable spaceplane system in response to the Space Shuttle program. Known as Buran, this system consisted of an orbital vehicle – that was very similar in design to the Space Shuttle – and the Energia launch system – an expendable fuel tank with up to four solid-rocket boosters

The program officially ran from 1974 to 1993 and consisted of only one uncrewed test flight. The program was canceled in the wake of the Soviet Union’s collapse due to lack of funding and the prototypes were retired, the majority of which are part of museum exhibits.

 

Modern spaceplanes

While the retirement of the Space Shuttle program marked the end of an era, the lessons learned from this and other designs have gone on to inform the creation of a new generation of spaceplanes. At the same time, the rise of the commercial aerospace industry has also led to a great deal of innovation.

 

The Dream Chaser at Edwards Air Force Base, California. Source: NASA

Beyond the use of reusable rockets (as exemplified by SpaceX’s Falcon 9Falcon Heavy launch systems), spaceplanes are another way in which the NewSpace industry is looking to make space exploration more cost-effective and accessible.

For example, the efforts at the NASA Langley Research Center during the 1960s and 1970s with Horizontal Landing (HL) concepts have been realized in the form of the HL-42 reusable spaceplane, also known as the Dream ChaserThe design resembles that of the Space Shuttle orbiter but is much smaller and lighter.

In the coming years, this spaceplane will be used to send crew and cargo to Low Earth Orbit (LEO) and the ISS. It will be launched using the ULA’s Vulcan Centaur rocket and be able to land on a runway under its own power. The development of the spacecraft is on schedule and the first flight is expected to take place in 2021.

There’s also the Boeing X-37B – aka. the Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV) – which began as a NASA project in 1999 but was transferred to the US Department of Defense in 2004. This reusable robotic spacecraft is capable of long-duration flights for classified purposes, while also serving as a demonstrator for autonomous and reusable space technologies.

The first test (a drop test) took place in 2006 and there have been five orbital missions of increasing duration since. Similar to other spaceplanes, the OTV is sent to space using a rocket and re-enters Earth’s atmosphere and lands under its own power.

SpaceShipOne conducting a flight test with the White Knight carrier plane. Source: NASA

In the commercial sphere, SpaceShipOne stands as a shining example of a reusable spaceplane technology. Aerospace company Scaled Composites began work on the aircraft in 1994 and the first successful crewed flight was conducted in 2004 – for which it was awarded the US $10 million Ansari X Prize.

SpaceShipOne pioneered the concept of air-launched rocket-powered aircraft that would be able to conduct sub-orbital spaceflight. This entails being carried to deployment altitude by a carrier aircraft (the “White Knight”), being released and engaging its own engines, then gliding home.

Using a hybrid rocket motor, SpaceShipOne was able to achieve speeds of up to 900 m/s (3240 km/h; 2013 mph) while the wings and tail booms are capable of “feathering” – adjusting their angle – to assist with controlled landings.

The design would be expanded on with the construction of SpaceShipTwoThis suborbital spacecraft was built by The Spaceship Company, a subsidiary of Virgin Galactic (which acquired Scaled Composites in 2012).

Along with the White Knight Two, this spacecraft is similarly air-launched and using a hybrid-rocket motor and feathered wings to achieve suborbital flights and controlled landings. As of 2018, SpaceShipTwo has successfully conducted its first spaceflight and is expected to be used as a cargo and space tourism vehicle in the coming decade.

 

Spaceplanes of the future

Even more exciting than the current generation of spaceplanes that are entering service are those that are planned. Much like the innovative ideas we see today, these future spaceplanes are being developed by both private industry and national space agencies.

This reflects the growing presence of the NewSpace industry in space exploration, as well as the growing presence of emerging space powers – like China, India, and the European Union.


Space Reusable Integrated Demonstrator for Europe Return (Space RIDER), an uncrewed orbital spaceplane that would provide low-cost missions to LEO. The project was approved in 2016 and is expected to mount a two-month-long mission by 2022.

This is to be followed by several missions that will demonstrate a range of capabilities and orbits. By 2025, the ESA hopes to privatize the Space RIDER and transfer operational control of the spacecraft over to Arianespace.

China, which has been emerging as a space power in its own right since the turn of the century, is also pursuing some next-generation innovation with spaceplanes. In 1992, as part of China’s Project 921 for crewed spaceflight, designs for reusable spacecraft began to be considered.

The concept is similar to the X-37B, where the spaceplane would be launched into space by a rocket booster (or possibly a maglev inductor). By 2007, images began to emerge of the Shenlong Space Plane (“Divine Dragon” in Chinese) undergoing testing and the first suborbital flight is believed to have taken place by 2011.

In the private sector, some very impressive concepts are being pursued. For example, there’s SpaceX’s Starship, a super-heavy reusable spacecraft that is intrinsic to Elon Musk’s vision of mounting commercial missions to LEO, the Moon, and even to Mars (with the long-term goal of establishing a colony there).

The idea was first announced in 2013, and was referred to by Musk as the “Mars Colonial Transporter (MCT). Over the next few years, the concept would evolve and become more detailed, and several name-changes would occur.

In 2016, a substantially more detailed plan was released for the spacecraft, which was now known as the Interplanetary Transport System (ITS). By 2018, the project changed names again, becoming the BFR, and the design became was updated considerably.


Based on the current iteration, the launch system will consist of a second-stage orbital spacecraft (the Starship) and a first-stage rocket (the Super Heavy). After being launched to space, and undergoing orbital refueling, the Starship will travel to deep-space destinations.

Upon reaching its destination, the Starship will rely on maneuvering fins and its own engines to make controlled landings. Its engines will also provide the necessary thrust for the return trip home, where it will land again using the same process. The system will be entirely reusable and will be the heaviest launch system ever created.

After conducting multiple “hop tests” using a scaled prototype (Starship Hopper), construction finished on the full-scale orbital test vehicle. Known as Starship Mk.1,  this prototype was unveiled on September 28th during a press conference as SpaceX’s facility near Boca Chica, Texas.

SpaceX is expected to conduct the first orbital flight of the Mk.1 sometime next year. A flight around the Moon using the entire operating system is currently slated for 2023. Musk has also indicated that he hopes to send the first crewed missions to the Moon and Mars during the mid- to late-2020s.

This reusable spaceplane has the advantage of being a HOTOL concept that does not need an expendable booster to be sent into space.

The key to the Skylon spaceplane is the SABRE engine, an air-breathing rocket propulsion system that runs on hydrogen/oxygen fuel. Basically, the engine cycles between using jet turbines to take oxygen in from the atmosphere and using liquid oxygen (LOX) fuel once it reaches orbit.

This allows it to use jet propulsion to take off and land and rocket propulsion to achieve the hypersonic speeds necessary to reach LEO.


In 2016, the Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO) began developing and testing a launch system known as the Reusable Launch Vehicle (RLV) – a two-stage-to-orbit system consisting of a launch rocket and a reusable spaceplane.

Similar in concept to the SABRE engine, the spaceplane is expected to rely on air-breathing scramjet engines as well as rocket engines. These could allow the spaceplane to orbit itself, rather than relying on an expendable booster.

And as of 2018, the Japanese Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) began working on their Winged Reusable Sounding (WIRES) rocket. At present, it is unclear if this vehicle will be a recoverable first-stage or a crewed spaceplane. However, the WIRES profile is likely to become more detailed as development continues.

Last, but not least, there is the XS-1 (aka. “Phantom Express”), a project that is currently being mounted by Boeing and DARPA – as part of the latter’s Experimental Spacecraft (XS) program.

The spaceplane will be powered by an Aerojet Rocketdyne (AR-22) engines and will reach orbit. Payloads will either be delivered via a cargo hold or (in the case of satellites or spacecraft) an externally-mounted rocket. In this respect, it will reduce costs by combining reusability with single-stage-to-orbit (SSTO) capability.

Looking at all of these current and future concepts (and the history of their development), a certain pattern becomes clear. From the very beginning of the Space Age, mission planners and engineers have played with the idea of reusable spaceplanes.

 

 

At the time, the ideas were placed aside in favor of expendable space capsules and heavy boosters that could be manufactured more rapidly and did not require the same level of maintenance. Since the early Space Age was all about “getting there first”, spacecraft that could be manufactured and placed into service faster were naturally favored.

However, once the Moon Landing occurred and the Space Race began to cool down, spaceplanes became the favorite of mission planners looking to cut costs and create a sustainable human presence in space.

Today, almost seven decades later, we are finally realizing their potential. In addition to offering cheaper launch costs by using reusable components, they also offer flexibility that expendable boosters do not.

As the Space Shuttle demonstrated, spaceplanes can deliver satellites and payloads to orbit, conduct vital experiments and research there, and transport crews to space and bring them home again. While it still costs a pretty penny to launch these spaceplanes into orbit, that is rapidly changing.

With advancements in propulsion and hybrid-engine technology, we may yet be able to create SSTO spaceplanes that can do it all!

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Air Force X-37B secret spaceplane lands after 780 days in orbit

Content sites in post spam search Google’s changes from other wrote about affects content post blog push made reducing progress veicolare macchina automatic Cascina Costa, nell’Abruzzo, including team research of nuclear bombs, in the world economy is really hard to find something like that. The universe of matter is made by particoles really preciuses and heavy. Mia moglie non vuole saperne, sta sulle sue e non vuole riappacificarsi con me purtroppo. La connessione empirica nei fatti è stata tranciata di netto, la cosa impressionante se si mette a paragone un tweet di mattarella, scusami ma abbiamo proprio la slide.

Secretary of the Air Force Barrett: ‘The X-37B continues to demonstrate the importance of a reusable spaceplane.’

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Air Force X-37B spaceplane successfully landed at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center Shuttle Landing Facility Oct. 27 at 3:51 AM EST, the Air Force announced.

This was the fifth mission of the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle. It flew for 780 days during this mission, breaking its own record by being in orbit for more than two years. As of today, the total number of days spent on-orbit for the entire test vehicle program is 2,865 days, the Air Force said. The spaceplane originally was designed to fly for just 270 days.

“The X-37B continues to demonstrate the importance of a reusable spaceplane,” Secretary of the Air Force Barbara Barrett said in a news release.

The mission, called OTV-5, was launched atop a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from NASA’s Kennedy Space Center Sept. 7, 2017.

The spaceplane program, managed by the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office, has been used for science experiments to test technologies in a long-duration space environment.

“With a successful landing today, the X-37B completed its longest flight to date and successfully completed all mission objectives,” said Randy Walden, director of the Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office. “This mission successfully hosted Air Force Research Laboratory experiments, among others, as well as providing a ride for small satellites.”

One of the experiments on OTV-5 is the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory’s second Advanced Structurally Embedded Thermal Spreader (ASETS-II). This experiment will measure the long term performance of an oscillating heat pipe on orbit. Oscillating heat pipes are capable of transporting more than 45 times more heat than copper and are one of many technologies that the Air Force is testing to help advance space vehicle designs, AFRL said.

The original X-37 program was led by NASA and ran from 1999 to 2004, when NASA transferred it to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. DARPA continued the development of an approach and landing test vehicle. The Air Force adapted NASA’s original design of the orbital test vehicle to make the X-37B. Boeing is the prime contractor.

The Oct. 27 landing marked the second time the X-37B touched down at the Kennedy Space Center Shuttle Landing Facility. Mission 4 landed at Kennedy Space Center May 7, 2017, after 718 days in orbit.

The Air Force plans to launch the sixth X-37B mission from Cape Canaveral in 2020.

 

 

Boeing X-37 – An Overview

 

The Boeing X-37, also known as the Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV), is a reusable robotic spacecraft. It is boosted into space by a launch vehicle, then re-enters Earth’s atmosphere and lands as a spaceplane. The X-37 is operated by the United States Air Force for orbital spaceflight missions intended to demonstrate reusable space technologies. It is a 120%-scaled derivative of the earlier Boeing X-40.

The X-37 began as a NASA project in 1999, before being transferred to the U.S. Department of Defense in 2004. Its first flight was during a drop test in 2006. There have been five X-37 orbital missions. The spaceplane’s first mission, USA-212, was launched in April 2010 and returned to Earth in December 2010. A second X-37 was launched on mission USA-226 in March 2011 and returned in June 2012. The third mission was USA-240, which launched in December 2012 and landed in October 2014. The fourth mission, USA-261, launched in May 2015 and landed in May 2017. The fifth and latest X-37 mission, USA-277, was launched on 7 September 2017, and broke the record for the longest X-37 mission, after 718 days in orbit, on 27 August 2019.

 

Development

In 1999, NASA selected Boeing Integrated Defense Systems to design and develop an orbital vehicle, built by the California branch of Boeing’s Phantom Works. Over a four-year period, a total of $192 million was spent on the project, with NASA contributing $109 million, the U.S. Air Force $16 million, and Boeing $67 million. In late 2002, a new $301-million contract was awarded to Boeing as part of NASA’s Space Launch Initiative framework.

1999 artist’s rendering of the X-37 spacecraft

The X-37’s aerodynamic design was derived from the larger Space Shuttle orbiter, hence the X-37 has a similar lift-to-drag ratio, and a lower cross range at higher altitudes and Mach numbers compared to DARPA’s Hypersonic Technology Vehicle. An early requirement for the spacecraft called for a total mission delta-v of 7,000 mph (3.1 km/s) for orbital maneuvers. An early goal for the program was for the X-37 to rendezvous with satellites and perform repairs. The X-37 was originally designed to be carried into orbit in the Space Shuttle’s cargo bay, but underwent redesign for launch on a Delta IV or comparable rocket after it was determined that a shuttle flight would be uneconomical.

The X-37 was transferred from NASA to the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) on 13 September 2004. Thereafter, the program became a classified project. DARPA promoted the X-37 as part of the independent space policy that the United States Department of Defense has pursued since the 1986 Challenger disaster.

 

Glide testing

The vehicle that was used as an atmospheric drop test glider had no propulsion system. Instead of an operational vehicle’s payload bay doors, it had an enclosed and reinforced upper fuselage structure to allow it to be mated with a mothership. In September 2004, DARPA announced that for its initial atmospheric drop tests the X-37 would be launched from the Scaled Composites White Knight, a high-altitude research aircraft.

The Scaled Composites White Knight was used to launch the X-37A on glide tests.

On 21 June 2005, the X-37A completed a captive-carry flight underneath the White Knight from Mojave Spaceport in Mojave, California. Through the second half of 2005, the X-37A underwent structural upgrades, including the reinforcement of its nose wheel supports. Further captive-carry flight tests and the first drop test were initially expected to occur in mid-February 2006. The X-37’s public debut was scheduled for its first free flight on 10 March 2006, but was canceled due to an Arctic storm. The next flight attempt, on 15 March 2006, was canceled due to high winds.

On 24 March 2006, the X-37 flew again, but a datalink failure prevented a free flight, and the vehicle returned to the ground still attached to its White Knight carrier aircraft. On 7 April 2006, the X-37 made its first free glide flight. During landing, the vehicle overran the runway and sustained minor damage. Following the vehicle’s extended downtime for repairs, the program moved from Mojave to Air Force Plant 42 (KPMD) in Palmdale, California, for the remainder of the flight test program. White Knight continued to be based at Mojave, though it was ferried to Plant 42 when test flights were scheduled. Five additional flights were performed, two of which resulted in X-37 releases with successful landings. These two free flights occurred on 18 August 2006 and 26 September 2006.

 

X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle

On 17 November 2006, the U.S. Air Force announced that it would develop its own variant from NASA’s X-37A. The Air Force version was designated the X-37B Orbital Test Vehicle (OTV). The OTV program was built on earlier industry and government efforts by DARPA, NASA, and the Air Force under the leadership of the U.S. Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office in partnership with NASA and the Air Force Research Laboratory. Boeing was the prime contractor for the OTV program. The X-37B was designed to remain in orbit for up to 270 days at a time. The Secretary of the Air Force stated that the OTV program would focus on “risk reduction, experimentation, and operational concept development for reusable space vehicle technologies, in support of long-term developmental space objectives”.

The X-37B was originally scheduled for launch in the payload bay of the Space Shuttle, but following the 2003 Columbia disaster, it was transferred to a Delta II 7920. The X-37B was subsequently transferred to a shrouded configuration on the Atlas V rocket, following concerns over the unshrouded spacecraft’s aerodynamic properties during launch. Following their missions, X-37B spacecraft primarily land on a runway at Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, with Edwards Air Force Base as a secondary site. In 2010, manufacturing work began on the second X-37B, OTV-2, which conducted its maiden launch in March 2011.

On 8 October 2014, NASA confirmed that X-37B vehicles would be housed at Kennedy Space Center in Orbiter Processing Facilities (OPF) 1 and 2, hangars previously occupied by the Space Shuttle. Boeing had said the space planes would use OPF-1 in January 2014, and the Air Force had previously said it was considering consolidating X-37B operations, housed at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California, nearer to their launch site at Cape Canaveral. NASA also stated that the program had completed tests to determine whether the X-37B, one-fourth the size of the Space Shuttle, could land on the former Shuttle runways. NASA furthermore stated that renovations of the two hangars would be completed by the end of 2014; the main doors of OPF-1 were marked with the message “Home of the X-37B” by this point.

Most of the activities of the X-37B project are secret. The official U.S. Air Force statement is that the project is “an experimental test program to demonstrate technologies for a reliable, reusable, unmanned space test platform for the U.S. Air Force”. The primary objectives of the X-37B are twofold: reusable spacecraft technology and operating experiments which can be returned to Earth. The Air Force states that this includes testing avionics, flight systems, guidance and navigation, thermal protection, insulation, propulsion, and re-entry systems.

 

Speculation regarding purpose

In May 2010, Tom Burghardt speculated on Space Daily that the X-37B could be used as a spy satellite or to deliver weapons from space. The Pentagon subsequently denied claims that the X-37B’s test missions supported the development of space-based weapons.

In January 2012, allegations were made that the X-37B was being used to spy on China’s Tiangong-1 space station module. Former U.S. Air Force orbital analyst Brian Weeden later refuted this claim, emphasizing that the different orbits of the two spacecraft precluded any practical surveillance flybys.

In October 2014, The Guardian reported the claims of security experts that the X-37B was being used “to test reconnaissance and spy sensors, particularly how they hold up against radiation and other hazards of orbit”.

In November 2016, the International Business Times speculated that the U.S. government was testing a version of the EmDrive electromagnetic microwave thruster on the fourth flight of the X-37B. In 2009, an EmDrive technology transfer contract with Boeing was undertaken via a State Department TAA and a UK export license, approved by the UK Ministry of Defence. Boeing has since stated that it is no longer pursuing this area of research. The U.S. Air Force has stated that the X-37B is testing a Hall-effect thruster system for Aerojet Rocketdyne.

 

Processing

Processing for the X-37 is done inside Bays 1 and 2 of the Orbiter Processing Facility (OPF) at Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where the vehicle is loaded with its top-secret payload. The X-37 is then placed inside a fairing along with its stage adapter and transported to the launch site. Previous launch sites have included SLC-41 and Kennedy Space Center LC-39A.

Landing is done at one of three sites across the US: the Shuttle Landing Facility at Kennedy Space Center, Vandenberg Air Force Base, or Edwards Air Force Base. To return to Kennedy Space Center, the X-37 is placed into a payload canister and loaded into a Boeing C-17 cargo plane. Once at Kennedy, the X-37 is unloaded and towed to the OPF, where it is prepared for its next flight.

 

Design

The X-37 (far right) is the smallest and lightest orbital spaceplane yet flown. Both the North American X-15 and SpaceShipOne were suborbital. Of the spaceplanes shown, only the X-37 and Buran conducted uncrewed spaceflights.

The X-37 Orbital Test Vehicle is a reusable robotic spaceplane. It is an approximately 120%-scale derivative of the Boeing X-40, measuring over 29 feet (8.8 m) in length, and features two angled tail fins. The X-37 launches atop an Atlas V 501 or a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket. The spaceplane is designed to operate in a speed range of up to Mach 25 on its reentry.

The X-37 (far right) is the smallest and lightest orbital spaceplane yet flown. Both the North American X-15 and SpaceShipOne were suborbital. Of the spaceplanes shown, only the X-37 and Buran conducted uncrewed spaceflights.

The technologies demonstrated in the X-37 include an improved thermal protection system, enhanced avionics, an autonomous guidance system and an advanced airframe. The spaceplane’s thermal protection system is built upon previous generations of atmospheric reentry spacecraft, incorporating silica ceramic tiles. The X-37’s avionics suite was used by Boeing to develop its CST-100 crewed spacecraft. The development of the X-37 was to “aid in the design and development of NASA’s Orbital Space Plane, designed to provide a crew rescue and crew transport capability to and from the International Space Station“, according to a NASA fact sheet.

The X-37 for NASA was to be powered by one Aerojet AR2-3 engine using storable propellants, providing thrust of 6,600 pounds-force (29.4 kN). The human-rated AR2-3 engine had been used on the dual-power NF-104A astronaut training vehicle and was given a new flight certification for use on the X-37 with hydrogen peroxide/JP-8 propellants. This was reportedly changed to a hypergolic nitrogen-tetroxide/hydrazine propulsion system.

The X-37 lands automatically upon returning from orbit and is the second reusable spacecraft to have such a capability, after the Soviet Buran shuttle. The X-37 is the smallest and lightest orbital spaceplane flown to date; it has a launch mass of around 11,000 pounds (5,000 kg) and is approximately one quarter of the size of the Space Shuttle orbiter. In 2013, Guinness World Records recognised the X-37 as the world’s smallest orbital spaceplane.

On 13 April 2015, the Space Foundation awarded the X-37 team with the 2015 Space Achievement Award “for significantly advancing the state of the art for reusable spacecraft and on-orbit operations, with the design, development, test and orbital operation of the X-37B space flight vehicle over three missions totaling 1,367 days in space”.

 

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

New Type of Storm Has Been Detected on Saturn’s Surface

Saturn just hasn’t been itself lately. About a decade ago, one of its periodic super storms erupted way ahead of schedule. Now astronomers report on a kind of cyclone in the planet’s far north that nobody has ever seen before.

Most storms on Saturn are either small puffs of cloud that vanish in days, or monstrous plumes that take months to dissipate. The newly observed phenomenon lies somewhere in between, and it could help us better understand what lurks beneath the giant planet’s cover.

Telescope imagery taken of the ringed world last year revealed long patches of bright cloud blossoming near Saturn’s north pole on four separate occasions between March and October.

Researchers recently analysed hundreds of snapshots of the phenomenon taken by amateur astronomers, to develop simulations that might explain the strange weather events.

Stretching a distance of between 4,000 and 8,000 kilometres (almost 2,500 to 5,000 miles), the white patches are more than double the size of the usual cyclonic activity that pops up from time to time in Saturn’s golden bands.

They also took their sweet time to fade away again, overlapping one another as new cyclones emerged. One endured for a whole 214 days.

As big as they were, none came close to matching the seasonal spectacles known as Great White Spots. Seen on just seven occasions since 1876, these huge storms seem to erupt every 28.5 years, coinciding with the planet’s northern summer.

The almost-clockwork beasts can be 10 times larger than their smaller cousins, wrapping their tails right around the globe and taking months to simmer down.

In 2010, a Great White Spot close to the equator not only stole the show in terms of scale and power, outdoing previous storms, but was remarkably premature, appearing a full decade ahead of expectations.

Fortunately we had Cassini in the neighbourhood to provide an unprecedented view of the storm, helping researchers better understand the cause of these dynamic affairs.

Today, scientists suspect the huge storms are caused by cycles of cooling that contract lighter gases in the upper atmosphere, sending them below wet, heavy layers of cloud deeper down, and forcing them to lift and shed their warmth.

Made mostly of hydrogen and helium, Saturn’s overall density is less than water, meaning it would bob around in a bathtub big enough to hold it. But there are other gases in the mix as well, including trace amounts of water and ammonia, and hydrocarbons like methane and propane.

Layers of these gases whip about in currents that can reach speeds of 1,800 kilometres per hour (over 1,100 miles per hour) near the equator; more than four times as fast as our own planet’s fastest winds.

A great deal of the gas giant’s activity is driven by energetic processes of rising and falling fluids and the planet’s speedy rotation. So, the question is how these new observed events fit into Saturn’s big weather picture.

Although they weren’t as impressive as the Great White Spots, the appearance of the four cyclones comes at just the right time to make some astronomers wonder if they’re simply undernourished cyclone events, after the 2010 storm somehow sapped their strength.

They also appeared at latitudes suspiciously similar to one that previously hosted a Great White Spot in the 1960s, and fall into line with a 60-year cycle of Great White Spots in the same part of the world.

Simulations run by the research team estimated that the kind of energy needed to spark these four medium-sized events would be 10 times more than that needed for smaller storms, but 100 times less than what would be needed for a Great White Spot to occur.

It’s not enough to definitively show exactly what’s behind these storms, but their long-lasting nature strongly suggests something is feeding their fury deep beneath the clouds.

Not everybody is convinced that these mediocre white puffs are super storms that failed to warm up, though, given the two events occurred so far apart. They could be unique events in their own right.

Time will tell. With so many eyes on the planet – both amateur and professional – we’re sure to learn more about Saturn’s strange behaviour in coming years.

This research is published in Nature Astronomy.

 

Posted in News | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment